![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/base/copper-d.gif)
|
Update: I forgot to list BITI calls, a short position on BTC.
A reminder - 367,000 younger persons died between 3 Apr 2021 and 3 Sep 2022.Here's another tweet, screenshot for records. Archived here:• From a factor - TBD but is embargoed mention
• Covid is now at 1950 deaths per week
• This factor is killing 6,000 per week (5+ sigma high)
• Cancer is at a 5+ sigma high
Whatever 'Factor X' is, introduced MMWR Week 14 2021, it accounts for 83% of the extra cancer mortality since that inflection point.
— Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) September 18, 2022
Cancer is like the Titanic, it is a hard ship to turn. Once it starts turning however, there is no stopping it for a while. https://t.co/vLxITkUUO9
A national emergency birthed The False Claims Act, known as the “Lincoln Law,” after contractors used the exigent circumstances of the Civil War to defraud the people, at the expense of the suffering and death of American soldiers because defense contractors sold the Army lame horses and mules, faulty rifles and ammunition, and rancid rations and provisions. Once again, we face a national emergency, where our military entrusted another defense contractor, to the tune of billions of dollars and millions of American lives. The Defense Department incorporated Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) rules and regulations into its contract by conditioning the contract on FDA compliance and authorization. Respondents ignore this critical fact when trying to claim they contracted away the False Claims Act. Don’t the American people deserve to know if Pfizer lied?I am skeptical of restatements in legal cases. The claimants say Pfizer has admitted to fraud and that Pfizer claims they're not liable because they were partnered with the government. I haven't dug into this yet. Objectively, we know they pushed a medicine that was worse than the disease. Legally, I don't know.Respondents seek dismissal without discovery, amendment, or trial. Their fundamental premise: even if honestly reported data showed their product caused more illness than it cured, inflicted more injury than it prevented, and took more lives than it saved, America’s military would still have given them billions of dollars and mandated it be injected into America’s military. Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud. This ignores two legal aspects: first, fraud in the inducement is a well-recognized basis for False Claims Act qui tam actions; and second, the military wisely incorporated the FDA regulations into the contract as a precondition of any payment under the contract by conditioning payment upon FDA authorization of the product, an authorization itself dependent upon complete compliance with FDA rules and regulations governing such authorizations and approvals. In the end, the law does not belie common sense: a drug company cannot induce the taxpayers to pay billions of dollars for a product that honest data would show poses more risks than benefits to most Americans and that ignores the actual contract and the law itself. Put differently, the alleged fraud goes “to the very essence of the bargain.” United Health Serv., Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, 136 S. Ct. 1989, 2003 n. 5. The law compels denial of Respondents’ motions to dismiss.
Archive:Two sites stand out from the #pfizerdocuments randomization log as major anomalies....
Thread Reader: Two sites stand out from the #pfizerdocuments randomization log as major anomalies....
HOLY CRAP!
— Jikkyleaks (Fan account) 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) May 9, 2022
Two sites stand out from the #pfizerdocuments randomization log as major anomalies....
Site 1231 and Site 4444
You are not going to believe this.....@AaronSiriSG @fynn_fan @ClareCraigPath @profnfenton https://t.co/A8FzDmq24S
Market Ticker: One In Thirty
Additionally, roughly 24% of people with pre-existing autoimmune disorders, and 5%-10% of those with diabetes, hypertension, and lung and heart disease, also reported a worsening of their condition.
Typically as time goes on you qualify some of the concerns and they drop off. That didn't happen this time; instead what occurred is that the concerns got much worse. As soon as that started to show up in the data, which was evident by last March, the entire program should have been immediately scrapped until the issues were run to the ground and fully understood, bounded and qualified with the public choosing based on truthful and clearly-communicated information.This article in The Blaze covers the Israeli data: The Israeli data that nukes the Pfizer vaccine: What did Pfizer know and when did they know it?This was not only not done it was deliberately concealed with "Big Tech", so-called "public health" and political organizations all lying through their teeth while refusing to examine or even publish truthful data sets.
The entire medical, pharmaceutical and political apparatus in this nation lied. The lies started with Trump's "Emergency" declaration, payment schemes and pulled-forward orders without evidence of effectiveness and not one bit of any of it has been rescinded since by either Trump's or Biden's administration.
To the Editor:e have read with interest the recent cases suggesting the possibility of vaccine-induced immune-mediated hepatitis with Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] However, as the cohort of vaccinated individuals against COVID-19 increases, the previously reported cases could not exclude a coincidental development of autoimmune hepatitis, which has an incidence of 3/100,000 population per year.8 Our case demonstrates conclusive evidence of vaccine-induced immune-mediated hepatitis with a rapid onset of liver injury after the first Moderna dose, which on re-exposure led to acute severe autoimmune hepatitis.
I haven't seen evidence of this being a threat to health, but it's one more piece of evidence arguing, "Maybe we should have tested these experimental vaccines instead of making hundreds of millions of people the experiment."
This also will put more wind into the sails of the Pureblood movement.
Summation of Major Insurance company corporate group policy Loss Ratios (Death Claims) Q4 rate vs 2019 rate:You don't have to agree with me that Pfizer is a short, but the risk/reward skews extremely negative on this stock. It is a politically protected company as long as the ruling class maintains political power.Unum UNM +36%
Lincoln LNC +57%
Pru PRU +41%
RGA +21%
Hartford HIG +32%
MetLife MET +24%
In a meeting between the various leaders of the insurance industry, they discussed what they’re all seeing on the ground and how to proceed.
“Additionally, they did something interesting,” Dowd continued. “They did a reinsurance deal for a high face amount individual policies, at what looked like very bad economics for them. On the conference call a Southside analyst was very confused. He said, ‘Why would you do this deal?’
“I can speculate why they did this deal. This deal looks bad now, but a year or two from now it may look like a genius move. And they actually think there’s going to be 300,000 excess deaths due to — they call it ‘Covid and indirect Covid,’ whatever that means — in the U.S. in 2022. So they actually raised their expectations for mortality in the U.S. during the conference call.
“So they’re not saying it’s the jab, but it’s the jab.”
Now, Pfizer - which just forecast $54 billion in Covid-related sales in 2022, appears to be anticipating some bad news, as evidenced by several redline changes in their Q4 earnings releases.As Rubicon Capital's Kelly Brown notes on Twitter, the changes center around disclosures of unfavorable safety data.
For example, in Q4 they added: "or further information regarding the quality of pre-clinical, clinical or safety data, including by audit or inspection."
Steve Kirsch: Unprecedented: Deaths in Indiana for ages 18-64 are up 40%
1. Deaths among 18-64 year-olds (who don’t normally die) are up by 40% in 2021 vs. pre-pandemic levelsI'm staying skeptical until some hard data comes in. The first possibility to consider is that SARS2 is indeed a bioweapon (or like one) with delayed effects. Another, less likely, is that the lockdowns are far worse than even the harshest critics predicted. I do think the vaxx is the most likely cause though.2. This is huge. HUGE. They’ve never seen anything like this before in their history. Normally death rates don’t change at all. They are very stable. It would take something REALLY BIG to have an effect this big. The effect size is 12-sigma. That is an event that happens every 2.8e32 years (as shown in the image below). That’s very rare. It’s basically never. The universe is only 14 billion years old which is 1.4e13. In other words, the event that happened is not a statistical “fluke.” Something very big caused it.
3.Others in the industry are seeing it too.
4.It isn’t COVID. COVID deaths are down this year.
5.Whatever it is that is causing this, it is bigger and more deadlier than COVID and it’s affecting nearly everyone.
6.The CDC is totally on top of this… ok, just kidding… the CDC is clueless as usual.
If it is the mRNA shots though, I'd love to see the risk of getting a shot presented in the format of "it's as risky as" and compare it with something like smoking cigarettes. How many cigarettes would you have to smoke everyday to have the same increased risk of death as taking the mRNA shots. This would crystallize the risk to people taking the shots, and also highlight why the shotmakers should be sued into bankruptcy. Maybe this story is why vaxx makers tanked today? One can hope.
Steve Kirsch: New studies show that the COVID vaccines damage your immune system, likely permanently
This paper means we will need to inject people every 30 days if we want to “protect” them. Based on the harm that the vaccines do to our immune system, it’s likely that the needed interval will shorten with each booster. If people don’t get boosted as required, they will be MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren’t vaccinated. That’s what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn’t mean the protection wears off (like we were told). It means the OPPOSITE of what you were told: it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (by suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). It means we were lied to.The study he is speaking of is at MedRxiv: Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study
Pfizer and BioNTech are testing a third dose of their Covid-19 vaccine in an ongoing trial of children ages 6 months to under 5 years after the companies found that the two-dose regimen didn’t generate a strong enough immune response in some children, the companies announced Friday.The change to the trial protocol means that the companies won't have data to submit to regulators until the first half of 2022. That's a change from earlier this month, when Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said the company could have data on young kids by the end of this year.
