Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

2023-12-18

Every SARS2 Strain is Man Made?

Remember the Omicron lab leak theory? No Joke: Is Omicron Another Lab Leaked Virus?. Theory then was based on Omicron seeming to be mutated from a year-old strain...the kind of thing you'd expect to see if a researcher was working with an older strain of the virus.

A new Japanese paper claims all the SARS2 strains are manmade: JAPANESE SCIENTISTS FIND INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE THAT ALL COVID VARIANTS ARE MAN-MADE

This has only dropped recently. Perhaps it will be debunked. I haven't seen anything yet. If not, this may never get the coverage it deserves.

2022-12-26

Lockdown to "Pandemic:" Covid, Flu and Cold Cases Go Wild in China and the USA

WSJ: China to Open Borders Despite Surge in Covid Cases
A sign outside the Peking Union emergency room warned patients it could take more than four hours to see a doctor. A nurse at Peking Union’s fever clinic said that for weeks patients had been forced to wait in the hallways for beds to open up. One elderly patient, unable to secure a bed, was lying on a metal bench just inside the entrance of the fever clinic.

A nurse at Peking University First Hospital’s emergency room said beds there were all full and the wait time at the internal medicine department was roughly six hours. The hospital public address system announced that nearly 50 patients were waiting to be seen.

A Beijing taxi driver said Monday that most of his recent passengers were traveling to hospitals.

I don't know if China is suffering a pure covid wave or an everything wave, but the USA is suffering a cold and flu wave. Many stores are out of cold and flu medicine, in particular children's. During lockdowns, flu and cold viruses continued spreading and mutating, but in smaller numbers. This prevented normal herd immunity. China didn't have nearly as much mRNA vaccine, so the lack of immune system challenges is clearly a factor.

Chinese were paranoid about covid a month ago. I think experience is the best teacher and they will be over this fear quickly. If the lockdowns damaged immune systems and herd immunity though, then perhaps China will suffer several waves of illness stretching into the next cold and flu season at the end of 2023.

The scientists promoting lockdowns were fools, the governments were fools and the doctors were fools for going all with it all. Whatever you may or may not be suffering, this is the direct result of lockdowns. The total bill for these totalitarian, anti-common sense, anti-science policies still hasn't been finalized.

2022-09-18

If These Stocks Aren't Headed to Zero, Memes Don't Work

MRNA and BNTX have targets of zero. I doubt they get there unless serious legal or government action happens, but those are huge topping patterns if they break. There are many highly speculative tech stocks with similarly insane topping patterns that aren't really going to zero. The tops are simply so large that "way lower" is the target. Without the link between mRNA shots and excess death/ cancers being connected in a court or government though, zero is an unlikely target. As a trader, the difference between $10 and $0 from current prices is negligible though.
PFE has an uptrend going back to 1977. If that uptrend breaks (currently at $35 and moved up to around $40 by early 2024), there's potentially massive downside. These are tough trades because we cannot time when something serious will drop. The information flow has been seriously negative for more than a year and it keep getting worse, but nothing happens. My general opinion is that this is a bear market and therefore trade these as you would any security, but with the knowledge that at any moment the "news" could break in Clown World. This isn't like being short Apple and thinking tensions with China could hammer the stock. This isn't a possible bad event with low probability. This is as close to a confirmed extremely bad fact such as Merck with Vioxx with an unknown recognition date. Yet at some point, it's going to hit if true.
Ethical Skeptic:
A reminder - 367,000 younger persons died between 3 Apr 2021 and 3 Sep 2022.

• From a factor - TBD but is embargoed mention

• Covid is now at 1950 deaths per week

• This factor is killing 6,000 per week (5+ sigma high)

• Cancer is at a 5+ sigma high

Here's another tweet, screenshot for records. Archived here:
Given the SEC is already targeting short-sellers, I'm sure that buying billboards that say "covid vaccines cause cancer" would not be a fun journey even if there was not even a hint of wrongdoing. All I can say is if the above is true, then it's the vaxx. Markets typically don't reward companies that mass inject hundreds of millions of people with the "small" side effect of rapid onset cancer and death. 

Do markets work anymore? Media? Or is the West irreparably broken? Since the world is inverted, I will make a prediction: Pfizer will sell off first because of the bear market, but it will go down more than the competition. Then some financial outlet or Wall Street analysts will put out a report asking, "Maybe because they injected everyone with cancer-causing toxic not-vaccines?" 

2022-09-17

Actual Science Coming In: mRNA Shots Worse Than Covid

The Florida Standard: Vaccine Narrative Collapses as Harvard Study Shows Jab More Dangerous than COVID
A new study conducted by scientists from Harvard and Johns Hopkins, currently in pre-print, reveals that the COVID-19 vaccines were up to 98 times worse than the virus itself. The study is critical of the booster requirement for American university students, stating in the abstract: “Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities.”
It's time for some capital murder charges for government officials, business executives, doctors and pharmaceutical company for pushing experimental not-vaccines on the public. They can't claim they didn't know because lots of us out here knew. At a minimum, everyone pushing the shots must be banned from public office or ever voting again. We have social media records to implement this solution. It's similar to Denazification. Remove the evil and stupid people from government. It'll work for about a generation or two, after which new idiots and evil people will grow up to replace them. Consider that this would ban Trump from office.

2022-08-31

Collapsing Fertility Might Hint at Collapsing Financial Markets

Is fertility crashing because of mRNA shots or because of an unfolding economic depression? I haven't seen clear evidence because I haven't seen economic-adjusted fertility data. If you accept that an economic collapse is possible, then fertility numbers aren't crazy. They seem unexplained because the collapse in the economy and financial markets happens after fertility begins falling. If fertility is tied to the economy and not the mRNA shots, it's forecasting something as bad or worse than the 1930s Great Depression.
If you're familiar with the mRNA skeptics, you have seen the falling fertility data. Alex Berenson will be posting a new article on the topic soon. For myself, I remain skeptical. Not because I have a dog in the fight, but because I'm familiar with the existing explanation for falling fertility rates. 

Socionomics Institute: Stocks & Sex: Revisited

This correlation means that trends in conceptions significantly precede expansions and contractions in the economy, which lag the a-d line, usually by years. Most noticeably, the lows in procreation coincide with stock market lows, not economic lows, which follow shortly thereafter.
Is Fertility a Leading Indicator?
In a new paper at The Economic Journal, Steve Lugauer, along with Kasey Buckles `00 and Daniel Hungerman of the University of Notre Dame, use data on more than 100 million births in the United States to examine whether fertility behavior anticipates economic recessions. They find strong evidence that the growth rate of conceptions declines very rapidly at the beginning of economic downturns and the decline starts several quarters before recessions begin. In other words, fertility is a leading economic indicator.
Socionomic theory posits that financial markets are expressions of social mood. Rising markets reflect optimism or positive mood and declining markets pessimism or negative mood. A key point: mood generates news, not vice versa. Socionomic theory doesn't say falling stocks make people feel negatively, it's that depressed people sell their stocks or don't invest. Similarly, depressed people will not bring children into the world.

The data is very supportive of mood driving society. Fertility doesn't start falling after the economy goes into recession. It starts falling before, sometimes years before. Mood doesn't affect everyone in the same way, but most people are affected by mood.

What's concerning about the current drop is that it is ongoing. It would make sense for a V-shaped drop in fertility that lines up with the pandemic. It doesn't look like that is happening. Fertility is still falling a full year later. The mRNA not-vaxxes are an obvious candidate because fertility falls as they're rolled out, but this raises the question of temporary or lasting impact? Both are possible. The other explanation, social mood followed by visible signs in the stock market and economy, cannot be ruled out.

Consider that national leaders are also driven by mood. What makes a President threaten to use F-15s on citizens? What makes the government and people clamor for potentially nuclear wars with Russia and China? 

I've chronicled why I think the entire stock market boom was Federal Reserve "manipulated." I don't think they intentionally drove it higher, but I saw a very clear gap between social mood indicators and stock prices developing into the mid-2010s. Signs of extreme negative mood include transgenderism and the horror genre. The U.S. is experiencing extremes in transgenderism that might only have a parallel in Weimar Germany. The horror genre in movies has been strong for two decades now and even crossed into pop music:

Socionomics Alert: Terror Pop

Socionomics Alert: Stock Market Peaks Amid Record Horror Haul

Socionomics predicts rising and peak social mood produce heroes and a clear separation between good and evil. Falling and negative mood produce anti-heroes and ambiguity. The 1970s saw heroes such as Dirty Harry and Paul Kersey (from Death Wish, notably being remade with Bruce Willis in 2017). Dirty Harry gunned down criminal to the cheers of audiences and Paul Kersey carried out vigilante killings. Rambo was a hero who ran afoul of the law. In the 1980s, the good-guys are within the law. Rambo works for the government. Many heroes are fighting communists. At the peak of social mood, the superhero was reborn with characters such as Spiderman. This quickly turned dark in the 2000s. Dexter was a serial killer anti-hero. FOX currently has a show called Lucifer with Satan as the main character.

Horror movies also rise and fall with these trends. Freddy and Jason, two of the more famous horror movie characters, were both created in the late 1970s and peaked in the early 1980s. Horror was a less popular genre in the mid-1980s through the peak in social mood at the end of the Millennium. Since then, horror has steadily grown its box office receipts. It also turned gruesome with movies such as Saw and Hostel, what some critics describe as "torture porn."

And now amid a new high in stocks, horror is at a new peak too.

That was written in 2017, the market peaked about three months later and then more QE...and yet more extreme social division, negative mood, still rising trends such as transgenderism. Going solely by mood, the S&P 500 Index should be sub-2000 if not sub-1000. I concluded that post:
Horror movies peaked in the late 1970s and early 1980s amid recession and a low in stocks. It comes back for a one-year blast in 1987, the year global stock markets plunged 20 percent or more in a single day. Horror doesn't return until the late 1990s and hits a short-term peak in the year 2000. After that, it grows into a larger and larger genre with a growing list of subcategories, before hitting a new record in 2017.

The implications for financial markets would be bullish if stocks were making new lows, since it would give a coincident indicator of a bottom in negative mood. Instead, this peak looks like it could be a larger version of the 2000s peak, a burst of horror at a peak as mood turns. If that's that case, the next downturn in mood, the next political shift, is going to a lot more like the 1920s or 1850s than the 1970s.

The existing explanation for plunging fertility is negative mood. Mood leads the markets. If the stock market crashes in the next few months, if the economy sinks into the worst recession in the past 40 years, maybe the past 90 years, then the drop in fertility is not only wholly explained by negative mood, but is actually a flashing neon sign screaming "Sell Now!"

I'm not invested in this explanation. The timing lines up with the mRNA shot rollouts. It being a side-effect would confirm my belief that the shots are worse than covid itself. 

The point I'm trying to get across: let's say the shots harm fertility. It could be temporary, permanent, it could be a major crisis or a minor one. Whatever the data is showing you and making you think about the vaccines, translate that into the economy and the financial markets.  If it's a minor crisis that reverses over time, the markets may dip and then recover over time. If the drop in fertility is off the charts and if the vaxxes aren't the explanation, it's telling me that financial markets might collapse off the charts. If you can't rule out a social mood and by extension economic explanation, then you had better be on high alert in the financial markets.

2022-08-29

Time for Pfizer to Die?

The chart looks like it could priming for a breakdown. A catalyst could be a fraud suit brewing in federal court. It is claimed the Pfizer trials were fraudulent. If this is true, then a private citizen has standing to sue on behalf of the government and collect a portion of damages.
The Comirnaty Ad
A national emergency birthed The False Claims Act, known as the “Lincoln Law,” after contractors used the exigent circumstances of the Civil War to defraud the people, at the expense of the suffering and death of American soldiers because defense contractors sold the Army lame horses and mules, faulty rifles and ammunition, and rancid rations and provisions. Once again, we face a national emergency, where our military entrusted another defense contractor, to the tune of billions of dollars and millions of American lives. The Defense Department incorporated Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) rules and regulations into its contract by conditioning the contract on FDA compliance and authorization. Respondents ignore this critical fact when trying to claim they contracted away the False Claims Act. Don’t the American people deserve to know if Pfizer lied?

Respondents seek dismissal without discovery, amendment, or trial. Their fundamental premise: even if honestly reported data showed their product caused more illness than it cured, inflicted more injury than it prevented, and took more lives than it saved, America’s military would still have given them billions of dollars and mandated it be injected into America’s military. Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud. This ignores two legal aspects: first, fraud in the inducement is a well-recognized basis for False Claims Act qui tam actions; and second, the military wisely incorporated the FDA regulations into the contract as a precondition of any payment under the contract by conditioning payment upon FDA authorization of the product, an authorization itself dependent upon complete compliance with FDA rules and regulations governing such authorizations and approvals. In the end, the law does not belie common sense: a drug company cannot induce the taxpayers to pay billions of dollars for a product that honest data would show poses more risks than benefits to most Americans and that ignores the actual contract and the law itself. Put differently, the alleged fraud goes “to the very essence of the bargain.” United Health Serv., Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, 136 S. Ct. 1989, 2003 n. 5. The law compels denial of Respondents’ motions to dismiss.

I am skeptical of restatements in legal cases. The claimants say Pfizer has admitted to fraud and that Pfizer claims they're not liable because they were partnered with the government. I haven't dug into this yet. Objectively, we know they pushed a medicine that was worse than the disease. Legally, I don't know.

2022-07-15

Manitoba Data Shows Vaxxed Have Higher Mortality Risk

Alex Berenson: Stunning official Canadian data show vaccines now RAISE the risk of death from Covid
In May, the most recent month for which figures are available, only 9 percent of Covid deaths and 14 percent of hospital admissions in Manitoba occurred among unvaccinated people, even though they are 17 percent of the population.

Manitoba, which has about 1.4 million residents, also provides figures that are adjusted for the fact that vaccinated and boosted people tend to be older.

Those show that in May, vaccinated but unboosted people were about 50 percent more likely to be hospitalized or die of Covid than unvaccinated people. People who had rec

Critcis of the mRNA shots warned of vaccine-induced enhancement and/or that the shots weaken the immune system. Researchers will eventually find the reason, but suffce to say, anyone still getting the shots is gunning for a Darwin Award.

2022-07-11

Cause of Deaths Invert in 2022

2022-06-26

Fertility Crash: Negative Mood, the Vaxx or Both?

Two tweets I saw passed around thsi weekend looked at Germany's and the Netherlands' drop in fertility.
Unless there is a vaxx and unvaxxed control group, the drop could be mainly driven by social mood. If mood is driving it, the drop will accelerate around August or September (mapping to the stock market peak rather than vaccinations) and continue sliding for at least six months.

Here are the Germany and Netherlands country ETFs. They peakedin May and August 2021, respectively.

2022-06-17

MSN Deletes Covid-Vaxx Story

Napo: MSN Quietly Deleted a Story Revealing That Severe COVID-19 is Rarely Found in the Unvaccinated
A research paper found that people who did not receive a COVID-19 vaccine had a lower rate of suffering a severe case of the virus amidst the pandemic.

The article, which has been uploaded to the preprint server ResearchGate, relied on data from over 18,500 respondents across 175 countries. Analysis revealed that individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 reported fewer instances of hospitalization in comparison to their vaccinated counterparts.

MSN – a news website launched by vaccine enthusiast Bill Gates’s Microsoft in 1995 – covered the study, titling its article “Severe COVID-19 ‘Rare’ In Unvaccinated People,” but appears to have taken down the story since its publication. Archived versions of the article are still available, however.

No surprise. Unvaccinated tend to be younger, healthier and according to this self-reported study:
They used natural products like vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, quercetin, and drugs, such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
It's an important story only because the media, doctors, governments and pharmaceutical companies lied about it and falsely hyped the danger. It matters because corporations and govermnents forced their employees and citizens to be vaccinated regardless of risk.

2022-06-08

What is Modern Conspiracy Theory?

My view of modern conspiracy theory is that is more of a orientation than a specific plot. "Conspiracy theorists" don't necessarily believe in specific conspiracies (although many believe in them all) as much as they believe there is an overarching conspiracy to some degree. A quick example: I don't believe in weather modification conspiracies. I don't think the technology exists. Cloud seeding exists. Weather experiments, even extreme attempts like HAARP might exist (although I don't believe that HAARP was a weather project), but they aren't successful. Natural history and cycles of climate explains everything weather related. 

Are a global elite plotting world government and takeover via claims about climate change? Absolutely. Are they faking the weather to do it? No, because it's not necessary. They have fooled the world with "science." Many "conspiracy theorists" believe in ludicrous conspiracies and ideas, sometimes to their own detriment. Yet this doesn't invalidate their general knowledge of a nefarious plot at work.  

Most of the "overarching narrative" of conspiracy theory is open fact. The Club of Rome, Agenda 21 and various other books and public discussions going back to the Fabians and writers such as Aldous Huxley and Isaac Asimov have existed for more than a century. Science fiction writers openly promoted global government, rule by the scientists in their books. Elites have discussed "problems" such as overpopulation for decades. I put problems quotes because one of the tricks of the trade is to take something that in extremis is obviously a problem, but isn't actually a major problem. As they do with CO2 emissions and the novel coronavirus.

In sum, I'm a believer in the weak form of conspiracy theory. It's an open, self-organizing conspiracy. It moves very slowly. Like one of those optical illusions that show a 3D image if you stare through it, it looks like a bunch of dots, a jumbled mess, if you don't know what you're looking at. At every step of the way, you're a "kook" for saying this is a conspiracy or part of a larger plot. Only by looking at the whole picture, the shift in policies over decades, can one see the sum total of it.

Vox Day is a strong form believer. In They Called Their Shot he writes:

It doesn’t really matter if the satanic elite of Clown World are divinely bound to announce their intentions or if they are simply narcissistic psychopaths who revel more in the knowledge that they are getting away with their wicked deeds than they do in the deeds themselves, the simple fact of the matter is that they do announce their future intentions, albeit always in a manner that provides them with plausible deniability both before and after the fact.

This X-Files episode is not an accident. This is not an astonishing coincidence. This is how, and why, it is relatively easy to interpret current events utilizing well-informed conspiracy analysis. Even when this episode was first broadcast, I immediately noticed the expositional clumsiness and contemplated the possibility that it was blown cover as cover, although I must admit that I forgot about it as time passed. But it was not the only such announcement. This habitual revelation under the cloak of fiction is another reason why anyone who submitted to the vaccine – which I will remind you was relentlessly pushed by international corporations and global depopulationists – was not only blitheringly stupid, but required almost wilful ignorance to do so.

We were warned. We were repeatedly warned. And I can assure you, it vastly amused the wicked of Clown World to see how many of us flat-out refused to believe their repeated warnings. The truth really is out there.

In the end, it doesn't matter if the writer of the X-Files was compiling the openly available information for the show or if it was more of an intentional announcement of future plans. The fact is that, as Vox says, the truth really is out there.

His post was based on the series finale of the X-Files, aired in 2002. Conspirators infect the public with a DNA-altering substance that disables their immune system, rendering them vulnerable to all manner of illnesses. In the show, it was done via the smallpox vaccine and assumed to be heritable. In 2020, govt/media nurtured mass hysteria. Inconvenience created by travel and work restrictions caused hundreds of millions of people to infect themselves with experimental mRNA shots.

Depopulation is a stated goal of a major faction of the ruling class. Feeding children hormone blockers eliminates reproduction. Feminism ("working mothers") reduces fertility. Making real estate more expensive, making life in general more expensive, depresses fertility. Abortion reduces the population. Contraception reduces fertility. Urbanization reduces fertility. Are all these policies part of a vast conspiracy? No, but the faction of the ruling class that wants depopulation greatly encourages all of these ideas. Drawing the line between what is intentional and happy (for them) coincidence is a mostly pointless exercise. A more useful question is, what wouldn't they do? Would they pump a deadly or fertility-reducing agent into the general public? Strong-form conspiracy theorists think yes and most if not all of them didn't get the mRNA shots. I didn't get the shots because I thought the risk/reward didn't make sense. I assumed the shots were riskier than advertised and the virus less dangerous.

Other conspiracy theories are ideas such as the "mark of the beast." No one will be able to travel or shop without the mark. I remember seeing that one in the late 1980s or early 1990s on some religious show while flipping through channels. A microchip would be needed to shop or travel. China and other nations have fully implemented this with vaccine passports via smartphones. Religious people and those who read the Bible are more likely to believe in conspiracies because they believe the Devil exists.

Maybe foresighted people saw the natural progression of technology. Through storytelling, they explained how easily this technology could be abused. Combine it with stated goals of groups like the Club for Rome, it isn't hard to theorize what someone who believes X might do with technology Y or power Z. Someone with evil intent will always be looking to use power and technology for their own ends. The 2nd Amendment exists in the United States because the Founders understood all governments tend towards tyranny. It was put there because they knew their Posterity will probably need it one day. 

I worry that the blockchain will eventually become a system for totalitarian economic control. One blockchain to rule them all, and in the chains, bind them. There are groups out there already deplatforming political dissidents from banks. Researchers at Stanford (marinate on that phrase for a moment) are already discussing how this deplatforming isn't thorough enough because the banned are building their own platforms and companies, from which they cannot be deplatformed again: Gabufacturing Dissent: An in-depth analysis of Gab
Our findings document several unintended real-world side effects of the deplatforming of both users and platforms, raising the possibility that other interventions on mainstream platforms such as downranking and limiting visibility might curb toxic content more effectively than shifting the problem elsewhere. If deplatforming is deemed the most desirable solution for a given scenario, it may be that this deplatforming would need to be more thorough and widespread to be effective. Hence, more study is needed in several areas...

...For example, payment processors have already cut ties with Gab—is there more that could be done to disrupt other financial flows? Answering these questions may prove crucial to developing more holistically effective Trust and Safety practices at the platform, infrastructure, and regulatory levels.

I can explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you. It's all being done in plain sight. You can either accept it or not. You don't have to become a "conspiracy theorist." Maybe it's all a general decline in civilization, the historical cycle with democracy collapsing into tyranny. Once you see the trend though, you'll see all the evidence in the news, in the proposed policies, in the propaganda. Some highly-placed people and organizations are helping this all along. It doesn't matter how much you believe in the intentionality of it at that point, you are a "conspiracy theorist" because you can see that events are linked. That a larger force is at work.

2022-06-07

The Lockdowns are Central Planning

Independent: Return of ‘work from home’ plan to save fuel in event of crisis caused by Ukraine war (Archive link)
People will be ordered to work from home in the event of a major fuel crisis sparked by the war in Ukraine, under secret Government emergency plans.

The Irish Independent has learned confidential details of an emergency planning exercise held 10 days ago between all the major state agencies and the Government.

...Delegates were given a scenario of a 20pc diesel supply deficit in September and a 35pc drop in supply in December. The third and most extreme scenario proposed for February 2023, is where gas and oil supplies cannot meet the demand for electricity generation or farmers preparing to cut silage.

The Irish Independent can reveal that in the event of a national fuel crisis, emergency contingency measures discussed at the high-level meeting include:

:: All non-essential workers will be ordered to work from home

:: A limit will be placed on all non-essential car travel

:: A strict limit on the amount of fuel motorists can buy at any one time

:: The implementation of an immediate and strict reduction in the speed limit on motorways.

The plan also includes the introduction of an emergency scheme whereby motorists with an odd number at the end of their car registration will only be allowed to drive or refuel on alternate days.

The market can instantly solve the problem of high fuel costs because people will ration it themselves. High prices, unfortunately, are the best cure for high prices sometimes.

Socialism aka scientific socialism aka communist are all forms of the Fatal Conceit (PDF link).

The Fatal Conceit

The book attempts to conclusively refute all forms of Socialism by demonstrating that socialist theories are not only logically incorrect but that the premises they use to form their arguments are incorrect as well. To Hayek, the birth of civilization is due to the start of societal traditions placing importance on private property leading to expansion, trade, and eventually the modern capitalist system, also known as the extended order.[1] Hayek argues that this demonstrates a key flaw within socialist thought, which holds that only that which is purposefully designed can be most-efficient. Moreover, statist ("socialist" is Hayek's terminology) economies cannot be efficient because of the dispersed knowledge required in a modern economy. Additionally, since modern civilization and all of its customs and traditions naturally led to the current order and are needed for its continuance, any fundamental change to the system that tries to control it is doomed to fail since it would be impossible or unsustainable in modern civilization. Price signals are the only means of enabling each economic decision maker to communicate tacit knowledge or dispersed knowledge to each other, in order to solve the economic calculation problem.
Below the entry on The Fatal Conceit has "see also Dunning-Kruger"
In 2011, David Dunning wrote about his observations that people with substantial, measurable deficits in their knowledge or expertise lack the ability to recognize those deficits and, therefore, despite potentially making error after error, tend to think they are performing competently when they are not: "In short, those who are incompetent, for lack of a better term, should have little insight into their incompetence—an assertion that has come to be known as the Dunning–Kruger effect".
Every socialist suffers from this, from those who want government run healthcare to those who think they can lockdown an economy, to those trying to solve problems caused by government policies of inflation and central planning with more inflation and central planning, to the communist governments that tried planning all aspects of the economy. It's one giant Dunning-Kruger all the way down. Socialism fails, along with other forms of centralization, from it's underlying assumption: that planning is possible, let alone superior to the market. The market here meaning, the individual freely choosing how to spend their money and not some euphemism for corporate control, itself a form of central planning once it becomes too large and begins behaving like, or merging with, government.

The wise man knows there is no more efficient allocator than the market. The wise man knows that, in the case of say education or healthcare or housing, that even seemingly simple interventions such as subsidies for the poor can have wildly destructive effects on the economy. See the current U.S. healthcare system which has been tinkered with by government for the past 80 years. There are many economic problems in society, but most of these fall into the category of nature (the lazy are poor) or law. They are either "permanent" problems or can be solved without any ideology. 

The fatal conceit isn't limited to socialist ideology, even if nearly all socialists are planners at heart. It doesn't necessarily have to be socialist in outcome, but the term "scientific socialism" exists for a reason. It can begin with the idea that the "wise" or "learned" can control the economy. When this idea takes hold in a democracy it creates a Dunning-Kruger feedback loop where the dumbest voters think that someone can plan the economy and vote for people who are dumb enough to try. Society spirals down through various levels of Hell on Earth as this feedback loop feeds on itself.

The key word being science. "Trust the science." The CCP often uses the term scientific socialism, not to describe socialism as much as their "scientific" approach to managing the economy. Now they are running covid tests on Alaskan king crabs being cooked in restaurants...(unfortunately I didn't grab the video I saw on Twitter, but that link goes to an India Today report that reports on China doing covid tests on cray fish...) Point being, if you can recognize the insanity of testing crabs being fried or boiled for covid-19, then you can eventually recognize that this is "socialism" and "trust the science" all the way down. The fatal conceit begins the moment one believes they can control nature. Hundreds of millions of people were killed directly and indirectly by socialists in the 20th Century who were trying to do the equivalent of covid tests on boiling lobsters. Their plans are insane or doomed to fail from the start.

We can contain most inflation. We can make housing more affordable. We can raise wages. We can eliminate energy and food shortages. We can make healthcare more affordable and widely available. We can do many things, but none of these will be accomplished with "science" or "socialism" or "corporatism" or any people who think they can plan society beyond the broadly general sense of things like tax policy. Should government fund itself with sales tax, income tax, property tax, tariffs or capital gains tax? All? One? In what proportion? This decision alone has massive impact on society. There are arguments for and against all of them. What's going on today is not government policy in this broad general sense, but a government trying to micromanage the economy right down to restricting the movement of people, restricting their healthcare options and restricting their speech online, the latter two often farmed out to corporations...

Almost all the Greens are planners, the entire climate hoax is like the covid hoax, taking a small problem and using it as justification for the takeover of the global economy. Our crisis is not caused by covid or the climate, it is caused by people who lie about the size of these problems and use that lie to justify their own power, and the increase of that power to the point where a totalitarian government can shut off your car, your healthcare, your job, your Twitter account.

We got lucky, I think, by the covid collapse revealing the plans of the Greens. It's all the same people, the same class of planners. They wanted to do exactly what happened in 2020, but they planned on doing more slowly and making it appear more natural. That they're out there celebrating high inflation, energy and food shortages finally knocked their masks off. 

2022-05-31

Suddenly the New Leading Cause of Death

Dead Man Talking: Australia begins to reap what it has sown. It's grim.
VD: When The Reaper Calls, commenting on the above:
So, the good news is that you’re not necessarily doomed if you were dumb enough to get the Death Jab one or more times. The bad news is that you not only proved that you’re literally gullible enough to kill yourself on the basis of a government agency’s recommendation, but you’re also much more likely to die of “suddenly” or some other cause due to your genetically-altered, vaccine-compromised immune system.

It’s possible for science and the media to hide or otherwise explain away a lot of statistical anomalies, but all-cause mortality isn’t one of them.

2022-05-15

Systemic Racism is Diversity

MIT, Harvard scientists find AI can recognize race from X-rays — and nobody knows how
A doctor can’t tell if somebody is Black, Asian, or white, just by looking at their X-rays. But a computer can, according to a surprising new paper by an international team of scientists, including researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Medical School.

The study found that an artificial intelligence program trained to read X-rays and CT scans could predict a person’s race with 90 percent accuracy. But the scientists who conducted the study say they have no idea how the computer figures it out.

“When my graduate students showed me some of the results that were in this paper, I actually thought it must be a mistake,” said Marzyeh Ghassemi, an MIT assistant professor of electrical engineering and computer science, and coauthor of the paper, which was published Wednesday in the medical journal The Lancet Digital Health. “I honestly thought my students were crazy when they told me.”

Almost every discovery is in the direction of destroying the concept of the Blank Slate. Systemic racism is a lie. There's no pernicious system of hatred or discrimination. At worst, there is a natural sorting under liberty. Which comports with what is an increasingly authoritarian and totalitarian system when it comes to race. That is to say, what do we do if the public cannot handle diversity?

As genetic science and AI discovers more innate human differences that explain away most of the "racism" in the world, it looks more and more like the people who cannot handle diversity are the very people promoting it. That the best solution might be taking all the people who complain about diversity and racism and putting them into homogenous societies. Both the people who are racist and hate diversity and all the people who are anti-racist and promote diversity, would be better off in a homogenous polity. The people who can handle diversity are the ones who can see race/sex/ethnic disparities and, finding no clear evidence of discrimination, can accept that differences exist.

If people can't handle the differences, then they can't handle diversity and need to live in a homogenous society. That has been the solution for all of human history. My hunch is that if we sorted the population this way, the number of people who want to live in the diverse society would fit into a few cities and they would probably be very similar in other ways, such as being highly gifted in intelligence, wealth, athletics, and so on. Another form of tribe forming along a different human characteristic.

From seeing social media and public discussion, many supposedly intelligent people can't consistently separate groups from individuals. Practically speaking, I'm not sure that diversity is possible at scale. The USA seemed stable up until the white population fell below 80 percent. As it heads towards 60 percent, the accusations of racism are ramping up because the white majority, soon to be plurality (or not depending on if the Hispanic category survives) is losing power. Increased diversity isn't creating a utopia. Combined with institutionalized racism via affirmative action, civil rights laws and assumed white guilt, increased diversity is providing cover for anti-white racism. The only way out for the USA as it currently exists as a political union is a rebirth of Christianity. If the country doesn't turn back to God, then it will break apart formally or informally.

2022-05-09

Did Pfizer Fabricate Trial Participants Before Cutoff Date?

Unconfirmed, can't vouch for it. Posting this because it's something that can be verified or debunked quickly.

Archive:Two sites stand out from the #pfizerdocuments randomization log as major anomalies....

Thread Reader: Two sites stand out from the #pfizerdocuments randomization log as major anomalies....

2022-04-22

mRNA Shots Rack Up Body Count Higher than Vietnam

Data shows most COVID deaths occurred after the rollout of vaccines
Millennials suffered a ‘Vietnam event’ in 2021 and Gen-Xers died in record numbers after the vaccines rolled out.
More than 61,000 Millennials and record numbers of Gen-Xers died in 2021 alone, after the Covid vaccines hailed as miracles were rolled out, leaving an unprecedented wake of mortality in the last quarter of the year.

The Millennial generation, aged about 25 to 40, experienced a staggering 84% increase in excess mortality in the fall of 2021, former Blackrock portfolio manager Edward Dowd told Breitbart’s Steve Bannon in an episode of his War Room in March. Dowd described it as the “worst-ever excess mortality, I think, in history.”

A body count higher than a decade of the Vietnam war and concentrated in only one generational cohort. Swept entirely under the rug because the TV and regime media won't talk about it. I wonder, what is the maximum body count this regime could get away with? If they can kill 61,000 Millennials and not only does no one care, but half the country applauds the great victory, how many could they kill before people start noticing? It's got to be well into six figures. Then extrapolate and you're not really far off from what some of the most murderous regimes of the 20th Century were up to. Don't think they can't get there either. As with communism, deaths from toxic vaccines would be classified has deaths of love. The intentions were good! There is no number of deaths that ever causes the do-gooder to realize they're the monster.

H/T: The Vaxx was Our Vietnam

2022-04-18

Claim: mRNA Not-Vaccines Cause Cancer

Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs
The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures. The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins. These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production. However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2. As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
I'm far more skeptical of all "science" after the past couple of years. This claim will be proven true or false in the next few years. Anecdotally, I've seen claims that cancers in remission are coming back. That should show up in the data more quickly, as in this year and next.

2022-04-16

Pandemic Led to Sharp Drop in Childhood Immunizations...And Infant Mortality Fell

Correlation isn't causation but the final nail in "science's" coffin is waiting to be pounded in. This is an unsubstantiated claim, but if the data holds, something worth investigating happened.

Igor's Newsletter: Florida "Vaccine Hesitancy" REDUCED Infant Mortality in 2021

2022-04-10

Shanghai Like the Final Scene in a Horror Movie

I could see a movie studio using this for an ending.

2022-04-06

Climate Lockdowns Coming

The Guardian: Heatwaves at both of Earth’s poles alarm climate scientists
Startling heatwaves at both of Earth’s poles are causing alarm among climate scientists, who have warned the “unprecedented” events could signal faster and abrupt climate breakdown.

Temperatures in Antarctica reached record levels at the weekend, an astonishing 40C above normal in places.

At the same time, weather stations near the north pole also showed signs of melting, with some temperatures 30C above normal, hitting levels normally attained far later in the year.

At this time of year, the Antarctic should be rapidly cooling after its summer, and the Arctic only slowly emerging from its winter, as days lengthen. For both poles to show such heating at once is unprecedented.

Unprecedented means unrecorded. There are times when the Northern USA is warmer in winter than the Southern USA, does that mean Earth is flipping over or the climate is inverting? Of course whether this is a fluke, or a trend, and whether is it serious or not is overshadowed by the fact that scientists are paid to create terror among the public. Terror that can translate into totalitarian, authoritarian global government.
“The warming of the Arctic and Antarctic is cause for concern, and the increase in extreme weather events – of which these are an example – is a cause for concern as well,” he said. “The models have done a good job projecting the overall warming, but we’ve argued that extreme events are exceeding model projections. These events drive home the urgency of action.”
Yes, these headlines certainly do make me think we need some urgent action, but not in the direction they are intending.