Understanding the extremist immigration policy; xenocide and suicide; why an immigration moratorium is the sensible policy

At one extreme is peak negative social mood and peak xenophobia: murder of foreigners. At the other end is peak positive social mood and peak "ethnophobia": murder of one's own nation (to make room for foreigners). It is finally coming to light that the immigration policy at peak social mood was in fact suicidal, as evil and extreme as murdering foreigners is during peak negative social mood.

We can tell we are in a peak social mood when we associate positive social mood traits positively, and negative social mood traits negatively. One such word is xenophobia, which is generally considered a bad thing and is often used to describe anyone who opposes immigration. Some people may consider negative social mood in and of itself a bad thing, whereas positive mood is a good thing, and certainly, when looking at major wars, negative social mood plays a role. On a broader scale though, negative social mood often has very positive results because it serves to clean out the bad from the positive mood swing. It is the same role played by a recession: weak companies are removed, clearing the way for new companies to form. Strictly using the words as they are meant in today's common parlance, if we have a lack of xenophobia during positive social mood, we want to see that balanced with some xenophobia during negative social mood. Of course xenophobia implies a hatred and fear of foreigners, and people against immigration may have no hatred or fear of them, but simply wish to preserve their own culture against change. However, During extreme social mood, positive or negative, the reasonable middle becomes extremist relative to the popular position. Common sense on immigration makes one a xenophobe, just as being for slightly less communism made one a traitor to the revolution and a reactionary.

How I am partly to blame for Mass Immigration
When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible.

It wasn't because we liked immigrants, but because we didn't like Britain. We saw immigrants - from anywhere - as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties.

Also, we liked to feel oh, so superior to the bewildered people - usually in the poorest parts of Britain - who found their neighbourhoods suddenly transformed into supposedly 'vibrant communities'.

If they dared to express the mildest objections, we called them bigots.

Revolutionary students didn't come from such 'vibrant' areas (we came, as far as I could tell, mostly from Surrey and the nicer parts of London).

We might live in 'vibrant' places for a few (usually squalid) years, amid unmown lawns and overflowing dustbins.
The West has engaged in nearly 40 years of an open door policy driven by hatred of its own people. The message of immigration was easy to sell because it was a period of positive social mood, but the reasoning behind it was as radical as a policy of hunting down and deporting foreigners. As the truth comes out, we see many of these leftists changing their position to anti-immigration. I believe it is genuine, but there is also the need for survival—when the population turns they will look for enemies.
They have taken the parts of them they liked, and made much of them.

They have ignored the parts they did not like.

Mr Galloway likes the Muslims' opposition to the Iraq War and their scorn for New Labour (and good luck to him). But he does not like their views on sexual morality.

The same is true of many others.

One of the most striking characteristics of the majority of migrants from the Caribbean is their strong, unashamed Christian faith, and their love of disciplined education.

Yet the arrival of many such people in London was never used as a reason to say our society should become more Christian, or our schools should be better-ordered.
If the left-wing turns right, who is left? The foreigners.

This is why an immigration moratorium is the sanest and most sensible policy to implement immediately. As social mood declines and more of the truth leaks out, the people will become outraged at the foreign presence in their nations and this position, today reserved to the racist fringe, will be the majority opinion. Nations that continue to flood their countries with foreigners are bringing them into a powder keg filled with xenophobia. And it will be impossible to stop because extreme xenophobia is a rational response to what has taken place. The way governments stop the extremes at social mood peaks is by giving the public a less extreme form of what they want. Halt immigration before the violence begins, otherwise they will have immigration halted by violence.
I now believe that the unreasoning hatred comes almost entirely from the liberal Left.

Of course, there are still people who harbour stupid racial prejudices.

But most of those concerned about immigration are completely innocent of such feelings.

The screaming, spitting intolerance comes from a pampered elite who are ashamed of their own country, despise patriotism in others and feel none themselves.

They long for a horrible borderless Utopia in which love of country has vanished, nannies are cheap and other people's wages are low.

What a pity it is that there seems to be no way of turning these people out of their positions of power and influence.

No comments:

Post a Comment