Robert Reich, a Clinton administration economic adviser:
Elon Musk’s vision for the internet is dangerous nonsense
The Russian people know little about Putin’s war on Ukraine because Putin has blocked their access to the truth, substituting propaganda and lies.
Years ago, pundits assumed the internet would open a new era of democracy, giving everyone access to the truth. But dictators like Putin and demagogues like Trump have demonstrated how naive that assumption was.
At least the US responded to Trump’s lies. Trump had 88 million Twitter followers before Twitter took him off its platform – just two days after the attack on the Capitol, which he provoked, in part, with his tweets. (Trump’s social media accounts were also suspended on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitch and TikTok.)
These moves were necessary to protect American democracy.
Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
The doubt increasingly creeping into my mind is that everyone who wants censorship should lose their free speech. That we should not try to create free speech while these people are around or in power, but that the solution is to remove them from power and the wider society. All major media outlets should be banned, all journalists working at major media outlets should be "deplatformed" for life if they called for censorship.
The march to authoritarian and totalitarian society is underway for one reason and one reason alone: the opponents of tyranny believe they are fighting society or technology or culture or some other force. They think they can oppose it with debate and education. No. There is one way to solve the crisis: remove the authoritarians.
Orban in Hungary did this. He created a free country with open debate. Those who opposes Orban, who claim Hungarian society is not free, are the same people calling for censorship all over the West. The ruling class is terrified that people will learn the great lesson from Hungary: that the ruling class and most of what we view as the fruit of a free society in the West, from gay marriage and transgenderism to climate and systemic racism, to endless wars all over the globe, bailouts for Wall Street, shipping jobs overseas (free trade is a false ideology too), mass immigration...it is all a manufactured belief system by an authoritarian ruling class.
Once their grip on the key societal control points is gone, it all collapses. Someone who genuinely believes in all these ideas would never be worried that people online oppose them. That people debate them. They are panicked over the Internet and free speech and run from debate because they know their beliefs are all false ideas that cannot compete. Or maybe they believe in their ideas, but know they'd be extremely lucky to get 20 percent of the vote if they openly stated their beliefs. They also may believe, in a bit of projection, that those who oppose them merely push their own false ideas. Non-Christian, "post-modernists" may believe there is no truth except power, therefore censoring your enemies is good because it's lies versus lies, and only one set of lies can win. They cannot fathom that there are people out there who still believe in the Truth. And then there is the smallest number among them, those who know exactly whom they serve and who they oppose.