Immigration Restriction On the Ballot in Switzerland

Swiss right-wing party hands in initiative to limit immigration

The Swiss People’s Party submitted 114,600 signatures to the federal chancellery in Bern on Wednesday. It demands that a new article on “sustainable population development” be added to the constitution.

According to the initiative, the population of permanent residents must not exceed ten million people before 2050. The government should then set a limit based on the birth rate. If 9.5 million people live in the country before 2050, the Federal Council and Parliament would have to act.

For example, temporarily admitted persons would then no longer be able to obtain a permanent residence permit. Family reunification is also to be restricted. International agreements with exemption or protection clauses would have to be renegotiated. If all this is not enough, the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons with the European Union would have to be cancelled.

FT Admits Govts Have Been Scamming Western Voters on Immigration

FT: The immigration smokescreen is beginning to lift

The EU collectively, which fears losing the global competition for high-productivity workers, is similarly trying to attract skilled non-EU migrants with a “talent pool” scheme aptly nicknamed “Tinder for jobs”. But a wave of fervently anti-immigration candidates are high in the polls ahead of the European parliamentary elections this year. If Trump is re-elected in 2024, his repulsive comments about undocumented immigrants poisoning America’s blood will also create expectations of a general clampdown.

Perhaps, particularly in the UK, the tough-on-refugees, soft-on-workers game is up. Audiences have worked out the trick and are heckling the conjuror. But if the alternative is taking the risk of actually being honest with voters, governments might think it’s worth trying the well-practised ruse once again.

It has never been about high skill immigration because they've been letting in wave after wave of welfare-using migrants. High skill labor doesn't go on welfare. The average immigrant into the West is using welfare at much higher rates than natives.

Western Ruling Class Starts Reaping the Migrant Whirlwind

The open door of the West is about to slam shut.

For the past decade, Western ruling regimes pushed mass migration on a public that wanted immigration restriction. They iced out nationalist parties, calling them far-right, extremist and so on for desiring sane migration policies. After sowing the wind with this propaganda, they now reap the whirlwind. If they fail to tighten migration laws, the "far-right" wins. If they tighten migration laws, the "far-right" wins.

France seeks to break deadlock over controversial immigration law

A deal has been struck:

The latest deal also introduces migration quotas, makes it harder for immigrants' children to become French, and says that dual nationals sentenced for serious crimes against the police could lose French citizenship.

Replacement of American Workers by Foreigners Hits Extremes

 ZeroHedge: The Real Shocker In Friday's Jobs Report: 1.2 Million Native-Born Workers Lost Their Jobs, And Were Replaced With 668K Foreign-Born Workers

Meanwhile, the number of foreign-born workers (i.e., immigrants) surged by 668K to a record 30.396 million

About 156 million people are employed in the labor force. About 1 out of 5 are foreigners and this isn’t counting illegal aliens who might run into the tens of millions. The total swung by 1.8 million people last month alone, or more than 1 percent of the workforce.

If an invasion of foreigners was good for the country, USG should be running massive budget surpluses as foreigners build companies and pay taxes. The opposite is the case: data from the Center for Immigration Studies shows foreigners use welfare at far higher rates than natives. Cities such as New York, Chicago and Los Angeles are now having political meltdowns over experiencing a small fraction of what Texas, Arizona and other border states experienced for decades. Many of these states were already on the brink of bankruptcy. They do not have the resources to deal with the problem.

It also isn’t really a result of busing from border states so much as the waves of illegal aliens finally overwhelming the United States. There isn’t enough housing, there aren’t enough doctors, there aren’t enough schools, there’s nowhere near enough money for tens of millions of new welfare cases adding to the burden of a rapidly aging society already going into inflationary-collapse over entitlement spending. If natives are quitting or losing jobs and being replaced with cheaper foreigners, they all qualify for welfare. The country is moving backwards, rapidly into Third World status.

Very short-sighted and clueless people think this is good for the country. It’s going to end up being good like atomic cornflakes, margarine and mRNA vaxxes. Unlike many problems, this one won’t get cheaper after people realize what happened. The country will first experience massive economic hardship. Only then, when natives suddenly cannot find jobs or have to take huge pay cuts amid rising inflation, or see their welfare benefits cut as is already happening in cities such as Chicago, will they realize they’ve been hoodwinked. Then we spin the roulette wheel and find out what form the dictatorship takes and how long it lasts. Even if its democratic, the man who emerges from this mess will rule as FDR and Lincoln did. Political enemies will be jailed., either the current regime hanging on or a new regime punishing the current one. Immigration will probably go negative for a time and then hit a number close to zero, staying there for a century or more.

The U.S. has been in similar situations before, but it was never pushed to this extreme. Foreign born population was high enough to warrant a major reduction or even near total ban on immigration back in 2000. Policy has gone in an extremist direction since then. The three prior periods: heading in the 1770s, the 1850s and the 1920s. Two out of three sparked wars and the third came ahead of World War II. Nothing good is coming in the short-term.

French Torch Pro-Immigration Politician's Home

Remix: French mayor in support of new asylum center in seaside town has his house burned down

The house of a left-wing mayor in France, who supports a controversial plan to establish an asylum center in the small seaside town of Saint-Brevin-les-Pins, has been burned down in a suspected arson attack.

Immigrants to the USA are probably the safest because the USA considers itself "a nation of immigrants," but there will probably be some rough goings for those who are openly unassimilated and also observably anti-American. In Europe, I'm expecting things won't turn out very badly for the migrants and it'll spark a backlash that will hit long-term citizens such as Turks in Germany.

Denmark's Identity Program in Focus

Quality immigration becoming a little more of a rare commodity every day, the key to success for Western countries will probably be like Denmark: being able to raise the birth rate, to accomplish the transition to modernity in a sustainable, to resolve the errors of past immigration policies, to propose a viable social model for active couples, to be able to preserve the identity and integrity of the population of origin.

Overview of Denmark's identity model

Dominicans Cracking Down on Haitians Again

Guardian: US warns its ‘darker-skinned’ citizens of Dominican Republic’s migrant crackdown

US officials in the Dominican Republic are warning “darker-skinned” Americans they are at risk of being swept up in the country’s crackdown on Haitian migrants.

The advice from the US embassy in Santo Domingo suggests that authorities there are using a person’s appearance as a criteria for detention of those suspected of being in the country illegally.

The Dominican Republic says it has deported 43,900 migrants, mostly Haitians, between July and October in an operation it insists is necessary for national security amid growing unrest, gang crime and a fuel blockade inside its only neighbour on the island of Hispaniola.

This will eventually come to Europe. Probably not the United States because it isn't an ethnostate. The odds are near zero in the U.S., but they rise with the degree of collapse that unfolds. It is possible that all illegal immigrants are eventually deported if there's no amnesty.

Political Dominoes are Falling in Europe

As in Sweden, the politics are flipping in Italy.

‘Mother, Italian, Christian’: Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s far-right leader on the cusp of power

How far-Right Sweden Democrats are bringing Trump's America to a small country town

"It's completely crazy that so many people here vote for them," complains Johan Tinné, the co-owner of the central Café Innegarden. "I think they've grown because of all the shootings and the gang crime. They blame everything on immigrants, and when something bad happens, they use that as propaganda." When asked if any friends and family also vote for the party, he shakes his head. "The day they start voting for SD, I'll end all my contact with them."

If you view politics somewhat objectively, if you can set bias aside when observing the whole picture, you can see how easily the populace can swing from a complex false reality such as "systemic racism" to innate tribalism. Or from one form of racism to another. It isn't that one is right or wrong, though your bias may argue that. It's merely the observation that, if you raise a population to think native populations are inherently evil, then it isn't at all a stretch for the public to then switch out white for black, or Russians, Chinese, Jews, migrants. What looks like moral authority is merely popularity and power. It's almost impossible that the natives, who are the dominant population group, won't eventually retake power on their terms.

My biased opinion is that the Western media, government and educational institutions rely less and less on dialectic, and more and more on rhetoric and intellectually-devoid ad hominems. As Biden did in his "MAGA are fascists" speech. A good reason not to engage in this type of propaganda is that it has a raw effect on the public.

Take a very complex theory such as systemic racism. Take the in extremis example of blaming anti-Asian violence on white supremacy, when nearly every single video shows a black assailant. If the propaganda pushes the public into an place of extreme emotional agitation and cognitive dissonance, if the public is starting to feel an emotional reaction such as whites believing they are being blood libeled and Asians are becoming anxious by the dichotomy of reality and propaganda, politics can quickly swing 180 degrees. An emotionally agitated population swings from "anti-white" to "anti-black," and stays there because of the video evidence. It doesn't require concocting bizarre political theories to defend "an epidemic of black crime." It's kind of funny that people who don't like the rise of SD in Sweden, say things such as "I think they've grown because of all the shootings and the gang crime." When a political movement intentionally increases shootings and gang crime, a backlash is inevitable.

In the 1980s, a reaction to the 1970s consisted of the Moral Majority turning against the smut and drugs of the 1970s. "Just Say No" emerged.  The moral part peaked in the late 1980s with Congressional hearings on rock and rap music lyrics. Crime was met with increased policing and incarceration.  "Three Strikes You're Out" laws proliferated. NYC saw crime rates plummet with "stop and frisk" and "broken windows" policing. Going farther back, the laissez-faire USA of the 1920s was effectively erased by FDR's New Deal, which vastly expanded government in a way that prior generations of Americans would have openly rebelled against. I believe current conditions are far closer to the 1930s than the 1970s. 

In times of extreme negative mood, political reversals are likely. If the right is in power, expect the left will win and vice versa. Across the West presently, extremist left-wing/liberal ideas are in power. It expresses itself mainly through extremist immigration policies (effectively open borders) and anti-racist ideology that treats native populations as the worst/lowest group in society. Global corporations tag along with policies aimed at crushing local labor. My view is these ideas have drifted into absurdity and cannot be defended. Since espousing common sense policies on immigration and race gets people labeled racists, then a shift back to "the middle" is unlikely. Instead, the public will flip into a moral mirror.

Moreover, it doesn't require complex theories. Should the government treat citizens better than foreigners? Should the government treat victims of crime better than criminals? Should government help workers more than giant corporations? Should government help companies build businesses at home instead of abroad? Should government fund social welfare at home instead of funding wars overseas? Most people will choose the former over the latter, except the current people in power. Two consequences follow. First, the people in power are going to lose that power. Second, I predict that every movement that is aligned with power from BLM to LGBTQ and so on, is at risk of also losing their social status. Not that they will, but that they could and some definitely will. For example, anti-LGBTQ laws that exist in Hungary, Poland and Russia will be found across the West.

The far right is having a moment in Europe. Actually, everywhere.

Pietro Castelli Gattinara, associate professor of political communication at Université Libre de Bruxelles and Marie Curie Fellow at Sciences Po, said that the far right is a global movement and a global ideology, even though one of the core tenets of these parties is a kind of nativism. That translates into a rejection of migration, but also of the social and cultural changes taking place within societies. The “woke” culture wars may look different in the US or Italy, but they are a feature of the modern far-right.

The "far-right" is diverse. The "Woke" around the world all believe the same things. They are globalists. They want to wipe out the nations. They call their movement diverse, but it is really homogenous. If everywhere is diverse, then it's homogenous. NYC is diverse because people from distinct cultures live/travel/work there. If everywhere is as diverse as NYC, then it is no longer unique.

The globalist goal isn't stability, but instability. They are using migration to destroy nations that resist globalism. Nationalists only share their love of their own people and cultures. Indian, Japanese, American and Swedish nationalists all agree that the nations (people) of India, Japan, America and Sweden should not be destroyed by globalism and diversity. The world is made more diverse by having these nations, than it is by putting all these people into a blender. 

War in Ukraine only highlights the battle. Russian areas of Ukraine want to breakaway and join Russia. Globalists are like the Ukrainian government trying to rule over diverse peoples. How much easier would it be if Eastern Ukraine was flooded with migrants who oppose joining Russia?

It is possible this is a temporary "moment" for the "far-right." I instead see a major turning point in the world. I believe it is very possible no one above the age of 50 will see the stock market higher (in real terms) than it was at the end of 2021. Prosperity is going away and whatever is associated with power today, could very well become unpopular in the decades-long downturn. More to the point, poor people value things like safety, community and culture in politics because they lack the wealth to buy it. The government cannot provide better material welfare if the economy is shrinking, but they can always provide more security and increase social cohesion with policies enforcing the dominant language, religion, family structure and so on.

One example: countries have already ended easy international travel with the pandemic. That is an anti-globalist, nationalist policy and it was mostly done by the globalist governments. A logical next step is to ban all migration, as that is a more "invasive" type of population movement. Even when they "win," the globalists will have to behave more like nationalists in the same way that laissez-faire accepted the welfare state as a practical matter.

It's Over for the Ruling Class

If I was rich and out of touch with the working man, I'd sell everything and move to someplace like Switzerland because the ruling class has lost control whether it realizes it or not.

Reuters: Fact Check-Video shows Hillary Clinton at a birthday party, not a satanic ritual

The ruling class angle is "fact check," but this isn't passed around as fact. It's passed around as rhetoric. The people think of their ruling class the way they think of Satan worshippers and pedophiles. As in, if there are public hangings they'll come out to watch. This shows a society approaching something like a 1789 moment. Perhaps people in 1789 France publicly said things like "the King is a pedophile" and that was not because they believed it, but because they were defying the King's authority. It was a small thing with great significance.

DeSantis flies two planes of migrants to Martha’s Vineyard

Flights to the upscale island enclave in Massachusetts were part of an effort to “transport illegal immigrants to sanctuary destinations,” said Taryn Fenske, DeSantis’ communications director.

While DeSantis’ office didn’t elaborate on their legal status, many migrants who cross the border illegally from Mexico are temporarily shielded from deportation after being freed by U.S. authorities to pursue asylum in immigration court — as allowed under U.S law and international treaty — or released on humanitarian parole.

It's a trope that the wealthy have their property seized in the revolution, but most think in terms of a communist-style revolution instead of a 1776-style revolution where loyalists (aka ruling class) supporters have their property expropriated. A revolutionary spark is being lit.

Denmark Sending Migrants to Rwanda

It begins.

Denmark’s left-wing government will begin sending asylum seekers to Rwanda after groundbreaking agreement

Instead of migrants waiting in Denmark for their asylum request to be processed, the country’s left-wing government will now begin deporting them to Rwanda after the African country agreed to accept them in a bilateral agreement.

The plan, which has long been a goal of Denmark’s right-wing parties, took more than a year of negotiations, but the policy goal is now closer than ever to being realized. The deal does not apply to only Rwandan migrants — instead all asylum seekers would be forced to wait in Africa until their asylum procedure is finished. The fact that the plan is being implemented by a left-leaning government points to the strange circumstances in Denmark in which the left has embraced many of the anti-immigration polices of the right.

The strange circumstance where a mainstream party used their gray cells.

Anti-immgration is the winning issue. Not only are these migrants going to stay in Rwanda, but the rest of Europe will start making deals with other countries to take migrants. And then they'll move on to unassimilated foreigners, eventually coming to mean Muslims. It was done once before and it will be done again.

“Every fifth young man with a non-Western background born in 1997 had broken the law before turning 21. It’s not everyone. But there are too many young men who take the freedom of others, steal children’s futures, intimidate prison guards – and leave behind a long trail of insecurity,” said the Danish prime minister.

“It has been going on for too many years. Girls who are called derogatory names because they are Danish. Or girls who are subjected to social control because they have become too Danish. A sausage cart in Brønshøj that is attacked with firecrackers because it sells pork,” she said.

She sounds a lot like Trump, no? The next decade is going to really suck for globalists and mentally ill people. If you want to know why the ruling class of America, and the West more generally, floods the country with illegal aliens, sends children to die in pointless wars, sends billions to Ukraine while people are homeless at home, why illegal aliens are given free transportation and never had any covid restrictions, why people are willing to destroy the health and wealth of a nation in pursuit of fake climate science, look no further than this image of loyalty:

The "right" is most loyal to its family, friends, nation. Loyalty moves out from the family. The "left" is loyal to foreigners, even enemies of the tribe in the extreme. The warmongers on the right are no less "left" than the nominal left because they are expressing a part of the same twisted ideology. No one with loyalty to their own people would waste so much blood and treasure on foreign wars, nor oppose common sense economic policies that help their citizens. That Denmarks "left" embraces common sense loyalty to its own people is the shocking thing in Europe? No, what's shocking is that Denmark joins a handful of governments in the West that place their own citizens first.

The American ruling class' attempt at labeling January 6 protesters as traitors is going to be one of the all-time backfires if a right-wing politician who understands that picture above wins. It is trivial to flip the entire authoritarian police state against the people who have the inverted loyalty because they observably behave like traitors by tearing down statues, defaming the nation's heroes, support foreign governments and illegal aliens and so on. It's also expressed by the research showing white leftists are now anti-white bigots and that trend has strengthened over time.

If America goes, then Europe will go down like dominoes almost instantly because look at Denmark. It's already happening. The playbook is right there in the open, but we do live in authoritarian times. Why do you think the DoJ and FBI are raiding dozens of Trump officials and supporters? There is nothing stopping whatever party or movement grabs ahold of the immigration issue. 

This isn't a traditional left-right issue, it is the globalist-nationalist dividing line. If you support local control and helping people locally, you are now "far right" aka nationalist and if you support sending money and effort as far away as possible, you are "far left."

Back to Europe, the icing out of the nationalist Sweden Democrats failed: The astonishing rise of the right-wing Sweden Democrats

But as vote-counting progressed, the right-wing bloc consisting of the Liberals, Christian Democrats, Moderates and Sweden Democrats now seems on track to win, currently with 49.7% of the vote.

While final results aren’t expected before Wednesday, Social Democrats have so far received the largest percentage of votes, 30.5%.

But currently, the Sweden Democrats are the second-strongest party, gaining 20.6% of the vote in their best-ever election performance. That makes them the biggest party on the right, in front of the Moderates who came as a close third with 19.1%.

Anti-immigration is common sense in an age where the ruling class is implementing extremist migration policies that exterminate the local culture and destroy local sovereignty. It is actually one of the definitions of genocide, and some people who talk about Tibet and Xinjiang in China do call the mass migration of Han Chinese into these areas as a kind of genocide because they realize its designed to crush local power. Yet when it is being done at an even greater scale in the West...it's only a matter of time before someone even more radical than Trump comes along to flip the table for good. And if he's an authoritarian, the idiots in the ruling class have build him the power structure he can use to eliminate their power with both shocking rapidity and shocking popularity.

Mass Deportations Becoming Viable

Open borders has laid the groundwork for an extreme backlash on immigration.

Homeless shelters in Washington D.C. are filling up with asylum seekers from Texas and Arizona. Mayor Bowser says “I fear that they're being tricked into nationwide bus trips when their final destinations are places all over the United States of America.” pic.twitter.com/7OOH6F2Dpl

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) July 17, 2022

In case this eventually gets deleted off Twitter:

The replies have some clueless Baizuo claiming DC needs more resources, but they are overwhelmed by people pointing out the U.S. government is unleashing these problems on California, Arizona, Texas, and really all over the nation. For all the crap California takes for its homeless problems, the fact that DC now has overwhelmed homeless shelters makes shows us California is also in worse shape because of open borders. Might homelessness disappear in California if all 30 million or so illegal aliens were deported? It would free up a lot housing.

Mass immigration is an insane policy. It is an invasion by foreigners. Those who support it are traitors, and I do not use that word as hyperbole. Those who fail to secure the borders abdicate their claim to authority, in the same way that a city that refused to police crime cedes power to vigilantes, neighborhood watch groups and organized crime. 

DC's mayor is whining after a three months of a small influx of illegal aliens. Border states and many localities in the U.S. have been dealing with massive waves of migrants for years and decades. There is no defensible political position except seal the borders and deport the 30 million or so illegal aliens in the country. Texas and other Red states should start rounding up illegals on their own and start busing them to expensive, left-wing areas like the Hamptons, along with Baizuo centers such as Seattle, Portland and Minneapolis. Not even the Baizuo proles support these policies. They only support illegal immigration because the TV tells them it is racist to oppose it and because they don't personally feel the effects. Reality has a way of crushing even the most relentless propaganda. We're hitting that point with the mass invasion of the United States.

The American public doesn't need any other reason than open borders to overthrow the entire ruling class for intentionally inflicting all this damage on the county. The irony too, is that there's no resouces anymore. America is not a wealthy country. The left's desire for things like universal healthcare are a total joke without mass deportations. As happened in Denmark, eventually a "hard right" nationalist element will emerge on the left to match MAGA and populism on the right.

Open Borders Killing the American Family, Driving Homelessness Higher

Housing takes years to plan for. When a government opens the borders to massive migration, it is placing extreme stress on the existing housing stock. Soaring rents, soaring home prices and soaring homelessness are a direct result of this policy. Inflation is exacerbating a problem that at its heart is being caused by the Baizuo admin's immigration policies.

From Australia. MacroBusiness: Immigration ramp-up will turn rental crisis into catastrophe

“Rental competition is tough at the moment”…

“The number of properties available for rent has fallen to historically low levels and demand to rent is up, particularly in the capital cities, with Covid-normal underway and the borders having reopened”…

“A return of migration and an imminent rebound in the international student market will continue to add to rental pressures, further shrinking the supply of available properties.”

Leith van Onselen comments,

All indicators coming from the Albanese Government suggests it will ramp-up immigration aggressively. It plans to use September’s jobs summit, which will be dominated by immigration lobbyists, as a Trojan Horse to gain ‘consensus’ for the biggest ever migrant intake.

Anybody lobbying to increase immigration needs to answer the following question: where will the hundreds of thousands of new migrants live when there is already an extreme shortage of homes for the existing resident population?

As usual, the many costs of extreme immigration are never considered by the ‘Big Australia’ lobby nor policy makers.

Australia is a microcosm of the USA. The U.S. is in worse shape because it is also allowing in terrorists, murderers, rapists, drug traffickers, sex traffickers and assorted ne'er-do-wells.

Immigration Restriction is the Issue for Total Domination

WSJ: Miami Locals Are Steamed Over Relocating New Yorkers Driving Up Apartment Rents

Natalia Solar moved to a 49-story luxury tower in Miami’s Brickell neighborhood two years ago. She and a roommate paid $3,300 a month for a two-bedroom apartment in a building with an Equinox fitness club, rooftop pool, and 24-hour concierge service.

She renewed the following year for $3,500. Then when her lease expired earlier this year, the landlord delivered some shocking news: He was doubling the rent to $7,000 a month.

Ms. Solar looked at other apartments in the building, but every two-bedroom condo available for rent was going for $6,000 to $7,000. Even with the recent pay raise from a law firm where she works as a paralegal, she couldn’t afford those prices and is moving out of the building.

“We’re getting pushed out by these people who aren’t native Miamians,” she said. “It’s happening with everyone I know that’s renting.”

The economic models that promote migration are false. CIS has the data on welfare use. All immigrations coming in and going on welfare are driving up rents, crowding in schools, hospitals, highways. Those who are not on welfare, but only average workers, are driving up real estate prices, crowding schools, hospitals and highways. This category includes people who buy a 7-11 or a motel. Only a tiny sliver of immigrants are creating businesses that drive demand for more labor and boost the average living standards of the country. The U.S. has a capital deficit, not a labor shortage.

There are other factors driving up real estate such as inflation, but immigration is a major factor. It is a major factor in depressed wages, drug overdoses, stretched municipal budgets. Trump swept the GOP primaries on the issue, yet wasn't willing to touch the issue of legal immigration. The first politician who seizes this issue will have total domination over the American political system if they combine it with a pro-worker, America First agenda that works on lowering healthcare costs, increasing wages and home affordability, reducing the trade deficit and so on.

Look at how much support Trump gets for merely saying he will do things like tackle China on trade, and then cucked at the first sign of paying a real cost such as lower stock prices or bad press. A politician who pursues immigration restriction as part of a policy package will immediately be the leading contender for president. If they actually enact the policy, the benefits will be so strong that even bad policies will look good. I'm the exact opposite of Bernie Sanders on most issues, but if he ran on immigration restriction, he'd get my vote and he'd win in landslide.

The time has come. Social mood is primed. Are there any ambitious politicians out there?

Texas Can Legally Invade Mexico

The American people do not have a government. USG, the supposed sovereign, has abdicated control of the border. It has ignored a foreign invasion. It has abetted a foreign invasion. Under Article I, section 10 of the Constitution, the States are allowed to engage in war against foreign powers to stop said invasion.

“We’re at a breaking point. We’ve got miles upon miles of border that just aren’t patrolled because we have to deal with, frankly, an invasion,” Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, told The Epoch Times.

“When you’re dealing with over 200,000 illegal border crossings per month, I don’t know how you don’t call it anything but that.”

Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states, in part: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion.”

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution states, in part: “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.”

An invasion of Mexico may not be necessary because Mexico cooperated with President Trump on the border. Perhaps it would cooperate with U.S. border states. If not, they're party to an invasion. Who will USG side with, a foreign invader or the American people? You have to think about your answer...maybe the civil war would be over before it even begins...

USG Has Abdicated Sovereignty Over the United States

All claims of sovereignty rest on a narrative claim. Kings by blood, democracies by the will of the people (hence why USG is at war with the people and the idea of democracy itself, rebranding it as whatever the ruling class wants). One of the claims for Taiwan independence involves the Qing emperor refusing to deal with pirates around Taiwan. If you do not protect territory under your control, it ipso facto becomes independent or up for grabs for whoever does pacify or occupy it. Another (since I'm on the topic), is that the Japanese surrended Taiwan to the U.S. army and the U.S. has never formally relinquished military control over the island. The U.S. makes no claim on Taiwan so this one doesn't have any teeth, but a truly imperialist American president could theoretically stake a claim on Taiwan.

In the United States, USG has all but formally relinquished control over the Southern border. Border states, led by Texas, are now in control of the border. The behavior of USG reflects that of the declining Qing empire. USG cannot or will not defend territory over which it has sovereignty. It will not defend the people from whom it makes its claim of legitimacy.

Recall how Donald Trump caused USG and the ruling class to lose its mind. First they had a psychological breakdown. They genuinely went nuts almost immediately. Then they initiated psychological warfare on the American public. They invented the Russiagate lie which carried into two impeachments and the January 6 false flag, labeled their political opponents as domestic terrorists. Why? Their control is tenuous at best. It rests on psychological control over the American public. The fact that many people entertain ideas like abolishing student debt (why only student debt and not medical debt, consumer debt...?) or think systemic racism is real, that climate change is a legitimate threat, that transgenderism isn't mostly a mental illness and giving children hormone blockers is so evil that it ranks aside the crimes of genocidal regimes, that  people accept the schools, media and government talking about white people the way Nazis talked about Jews, are signs they are controlled by the media. Nearly everything they talk about it total bullshit. If we were under a corrupt theological government, the blue checks on Twitter would be in a moral panic over the declining number of angels on pinheads.

The country is run so poorly at this point, with USG either in open warfare against the middle class or engaged in anarcho-tyranny where it lets criminals run free (yesterday's NYC subway shooter was on the FBI terror watchlist), that anyone who stops hurting the people will be a wildly popular President.

The ruling class is engaged in totalitarian thought control because it is illegitimate. As fast as Trump went from a joke to POTUS, about 18 months, so could the entire ruling class collapse if someone steps up and starts seizing power. If someone steps up and begins acting in the interest of the people instead of the interests of foreign invaders and the parasitical ruling class.

Fox: First Texas bus drops off migrants blocks from US Capitol in Washington, DC

A bus from Texas arrived in Washington, D.C. Wednesday morning, transporting dozens of illegal immigrants as part of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s new plan to counter federal immigration policies during an ongoing border crisis.

Abbott announced last week that he was directing the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) to transport migrants released from federal custody in Texas to the nation’s capital and other locations outside his state.

...According to TDEM, Abbott’s plan is already working. The agency told Fox News on Monday that many of the communities that originally reached out for support – from the Rio Grande Valley to Terrell County – say the federal government stopped dropping immigrants in their towns since Abbott's announcement on April 6.

The United States is beyond democracy now. It has entered a volatile, chaotic stage of Machiavellian power politics. Something new will emerge or someone/movement will emerge and restore order. Anyone, from anywhere, could emerge as this new power center. It could be a single man if the U.S. drifts into authoritarianism. It could be states that work together, individually or eventually in concert. Debates in the House and Senate, executive orders by POTUS, even decisions by SCOTUS can all be ignored by someone acting in the interests of the people. The Mandate of Heaven is up for grabs. In these times, the worst things for a patriot are a lack of imagination and a lack of ambition.

Elon Musk is Tying to Decolonize Twitter

The world is so inverted that racist, anti-Western Indians and Chinese colonize American institutions, use them to punish Americans who had nothing to do with past colonization, and justify it by a moral appeal to prior colonization...without ever realizing they have now inverted their moral standing. All the anti-white and anti-American propaganda can be tolerated when it is seemingly coming from whites and guilt-ridden Westerners. One may disagree, but it seems authentic. Indians and Chinese are clearly not white though, and many of them harbor legitimately racist ideas about their own ethnic and religious superiority. When the same words and ideas that were tolerated before come out of their mouths, the jig is up. They out themselves as invaders and colonists.

One cannot immigrate to a foreign country and credibly claim to be a member of that society, while harboring such bigoted ideas and openly proclaiming them. It would never even cross my mind to speak about a foreign country in the way these people do, while being in that country as a tourist, let alone an immigrant. To move there would be to tacitly accept the culture and way of life, or at least be tolerant of it.

If you fully understand this dichotomy, then you can understand why banning things like CRT, and talk of white privilege and systemic racism is crucial to preventing a social disaster. The country is racially oppressing a majority of the population, they are persecuting the younger generation, and in another 10 years or so it will be impossible to stop what follows. The Baizuo will die off and be replaced by openly racist Indians, Chinese and so forth. A generation of now-adult whites will realize they've been racially persecuted their entire lives by foreign racists. Minority groups such as blacks and Hispanics are either already racist against these groups, or resent them for their relative wealth and power within the ranks of the Democrats. There are already fights between blacks and Hispanics and Asians over school budgets and policy in diverse states such as California. The toxic mentality described by Wax in these videos is running wild because Baizuo have created this "safe space" for extreme racism and bigotry as long as it is anti-white.

Wax then attacks Indian immigrants for criticizing things in the US when "their country is a shithole" and goes on to say that "the role of envy and shame in the way that the third world regards the first world [...] creates ingratitude of the most monstrous kind." pic.twitter.com/dUL9coinS9

— nikki mccann ramírez (@NikkiMcR) April 11, 2022

Whether you agree or not, the fact that this is starting to be openly talked about is a sign of what is coming. We are living in the peak Baizuo moment. People openly spouting bigotry against the majority population and claiming moral justification for it, on the assumption the population will never lift a finger against them, are in for a shock. They will be doubly and triple shocked when both their pro-American co-ethnics and their ancestral governments side against them too.

Texas Goes to the Truckers

To the list of things slowing and disrupting supply chains, add a border state that is fed up with being invaded from the south.

ZH: Texas Clogs Ports Of Entry As State Forces Attention On Illegal Immigration

DPS officers have conducted “enhanced commercial vehicle safety inspections” since April 6 at seven ports of entry—Brownsville, Los Indios, Pharr, Laredo, Eagle Pass, Del Rio, and El Paso. Texas has 28 land ports of entry with Mexico.

Significant slowdowns were recorded at the Pharr-Reynosa International Bridge, with the wait time increasing up to 4 hours, according to real-time data captured on the Customs and Border Protection website. Laredo and Brownsville bridges experienced the same. Wait time is recorded from when a vehicle passes the Mexican toll gate until it clears U.S. customs.

Under older concepts of law and sovereignty, USG has abdicated control over the United States by refusing to control the border. I say older, but not outdated. The Gods of the Copybook Headings haven't returned yet. When they do, the political movement/man who guarantees control of the border becomes "king."

The Closing of the West Begins

Two different stories, two different continents, same multi-generation trend underway. ZH: Canada Set To Announce 2 Year Ban On Foreign Purchases Of Residential Real Estate

"The foreign buyers ban will apply to condos, apartments, and single residential units," according to CTV. "Permanent residents, foreign workers, and students will be excluded from this new measure. Foreigners who are purchasing their primary residence here in Canada will be exempt."

The effects will likely be dramatic, as foreign purchases of real estate accounted for a lot of the bid that helped Canadian housing skyrocket to begin with.

"The timing is a classic case of closing the barn door after the horses have left," ForexLive's Adam Button wrote this week. He noted that the market had already started to cool in March amidst interest rate hikes.

It seems that way, but not if you realize this ban will last 20 or more years. Note that the Liberal government (nominally pro-diversity and pro-foreigner) is doing this, which means when the right returns to power, it will likely expand the rule.

Marine Le Pen is leading in a run-off poll for France's presidential election. Immigration is coming to an end. Mass deportation of unassimilated immigrants is coming. Western Europe could be virtually Muslim free by 2040, via deportations and assimilation and religious conversion.

As for the real estate topic, I discussed that before and explained why it is inevitable. A combination of affordability and demographic reality. Quick summary: the West was open because it could afford to be. The West made up the vast majority of middle class and wealthy people all the way until the fall of communism in the 1990s. In another decade, there will easily be several hundred million people who can outbid Americans for their homes. See this post from 2019: The West Will Restrict Foreign Home Ownership

Italy has been at the forefront of nationalist action and also, it drives home the point about the demographics. Here in 2017: Socionomics Alert: Europeans Hate Tourists, Let Alone Migrants and here in 2018: Mass Deportations Coming to Italy. (That was a provocative title as deportations are in the future, but I do expect Italy will lead the way unless France overtakes it here.) The big story there: they want tourism restricted! Italian cities that are popular tourist destinations, where it is a major part of the economy, want restrictions. For the same reason as real estate bans are coming: the number of people who can afford to visit far exceeds the carrying capacity of the culture.

I do not say this as an anti-natalist, but as reality: there are too many people. Only so many can live in a place without creating overcrowding. Each culture has a different definition. Chinese can live packed into small apartments, but many Americans want to live like lonely hermits in the woods. Chinese like "re nao," lots of loud noises, lights, fireworks going off. While the U.S. has noisy business districts, many places restrict noise and light pollution. I've lived in both countries and each has their merits. If forced to choose I'd pick rural American living, but I would miss China's cities. Still, the reality is the cultures are like oil and water in some ways, yin and yang. They cannot coexist on the same space of land. Hence noisy Chinatowns in China. And if you go to a foreign area in Beijing or Shanghai, you notice the population density and noise drops a great deal. Once I had a Chinese friend visit my hometown in the USA, a somewhat rural area, and she said "Oh it's so empty here, you can build so much!" Meanwhile, trying to get any development in that area is like pulling teeth because people live there because it is spacious.

Mass immigration into the West is already triggering conflict and it will boil over. Additionally, many immigrants came to the West because it is spacious and affordable, so you have situations such as immigrant Chinese demanding bans on foreign real estate buying in Vancouver. While the native white population might still have some misplaced racial guilt, recent immigrants may lead the charge for closing the doors to preserve the West they came for.

Toss in declining social mood, economic decline and the eventual financial and economic crises that will turn much of the West into "developing nations," plus the growing wave of nationalism, the coming wave of religious revival, the fracturing of the world into economic and information blocs...it's inevitable where this is headed at least for a time, if not for centuries to come. It could lead to a more peaceful world if nationalism turns inward instead of outward, but either way, the West will close its doors. Western universalism is ending right now, as we see with the Baizuo admin claiming "the world" is against Russia, which is far from the case. The West will eventually refocus on its European heritage, Christian religion and historic and cultural ties.

Since East Asia has far higher population density already and is far more culturally confident, it might become more open than the West for travel and living. It's likely the West will become intellectually open again. Today is the intellectual and moral Dark Age in the West with universities, media and science subverted by Mammon and Satan. The future will be brighter on that score, but good luck moving in for a few decades or more.

Will Baizuo Admin Unleash Murder and Mayhem Ahead of Midterms?

Axios: Biden officials fear "mass migration event" if COVID policies end

U.S. intelligence officials are privately bracing for a massive influx of more than 170,000 migrants at the Mexico border if COVID-era policies that allow instant expulsions during the public health emergency are ended, sources with direct knowledge of the discussions tell Axios.

Drug traffickers, sex traffickers, terrorists, hitmen, "criminal tourists," and assorted menagerie of economic and opportunistic welfare migrants are all waiting to pour across the border.

Immigration was the key issue heading into 2016. Nothing I discussed in 2014, when I saw the potential for Trump entering and winning the Republican nomination for President has been solved: Immigration Issue Set to Explode in America; Prepare for Political Volatility. Instead, the ruling class has gone in the opposite direction, making it abundantly clear to anyone who pays attention that they do not care one iota for the American people. God only knows what it coming because there isn't much on the scene with Trump still hanging over the party.

American Regime Change is Coming

Even a regime institution, Wharton, is showing that deporting all illegal immigrants (and legal ones on welfare) is the right policy.

Immigration and America’s Aging ‘Time Bomb’

“We find that, after an initial period, increasing legal immigration improves both the government’s fiscal balance and the economy on a per-capita basis,” the paper stated. “Legalization policies [or regularizing undocumented immigrants], on the other hand, worsen the government’s fiscal balance due to increased spending, while having modest effects on the economy broadly.” Lawful immigrants receive government transfers over their lifetime such as Social Security benefits, Medicaid, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); if they are not sufficiently productive, they create a “retirement benefits imbalance,” the paper pointed out.

This is common sense. This is data that is publicly available and has been for a decade or more. They don't go into the weeds in this study above, but the Center for Immigration Studies has. See more at: Immigration: The Key Political Issue

Nearly all immigrants broken down by ethnic group and race, use more welfare than natives. Ninety-percent of legal Hispanic immigrants are on welfare. The reality is very few immigrants are actually "adding" the economy such that it improves the lives of native citizens because to do that, they must produce so much economic output that it more than makes up for costs such as higher housing prices.

The policy implications are clear. America should all but close the door on immigration for decades at least. It should deport all illegal aliens and all legal aliens on welfare. Many "citizens" likely forged immigration documents (including Congressperson Omar), have committed crimes or engaged in anti-American activities that should see them stripped of citizenship and deported. This type of policy is coming because the alternative is the nation falls apart. Forced assimilation is coming one way or another, either because the nation breaks into more ethnically homogenous states or because the national zeitgeist does a 180 degree turn. Even in the Ivy League heart of Baizuodom, institutions are starting to give air to the reality of the situation.

All that's needed is a final breaking of narrative control. Hence the totalitarian impulse by the Baizuo. They are terrified of open debate because they are so far on the extreme with their open borders policy, they are literally making open warfare upon the American people (throughout history, when a huge wave of people suddenly show up in someone else's land, it ends with bloodshed and destruction of the native peoples or the invaders). Any open discussion of the immigration issue will end with the Baizuo removed from power solely on this issue. It is their Achilles' heel. Immigration is what put Trump in office. It will put him back again should he run on the issue, and it is the issue that will ultimately bring down the ruling class because they're normalizing talk of treason and traitors now. That's the word that will be used to describe politicians and NGOs that facilitated the mass invasion of the USA.